War Room: “Bubba Effect” – Martial Law, Looting, Hyperinflation, Depression, Chaos, America Implodes

Are you a Bubba? If not then you are doomed, but don’t let that bum you out, because it’s possible that none of this stuff will even happen. If any or all of this happens, I will be with my family and close friends in a compound of our own making. No outsiders will be allowed, and trespassers will be shot on site. It will be every man for himself. I hope that you are all ready for what is coming, and that you are a member of a Militia. Glenn Beck has warned you of this doomsday scenario, now it is up to you, you will have to take it from here.
jbranstetter04

Washington Post
Monday, December 1, 2008

The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.

The long-planned shift in the Defense Department’s role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.

There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military’s role in domestic law enforcement.

But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., commander of the U.S. Northern Command.

Bert B. Tussing, director of homeland defense and security issues at the U.S. Army War College’s Center for Strategic Leadership, said the new Pentagon approach “breaks the mold” by assigning an active-duty combat brigade to the Northern Command for the first time. Until now, the military required the command to rely on troops requested from other sources.

18th Amendment : The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits members of the federal uniformed services (the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) in the former Confederate states.
The statute prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.

For troops to be deployed, a condition has to exist that, (1) So hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-218695.htm

Duration : 0:10:48

Read more about War Room: “Bubba Effect” – Martial Law, Looting, Hyperinflation, Depression, Chaos, America Implodes

Legal Headline News 10/8/2010

Supreme Court hears funeral protest case
Commission says White House did poor job with the BP oil spill
President won’t sign legislation making it easier for lenders to foreclose
Glaxo Smith Kline wins.
More at http://lbnnews.com

Duration : 0:2:36

Read more about Legal Headline News 10/8/2010

Taking Free Exercise Rights Seriously

March 30, 2006
Speaker: Professor Alan E. Brownstein, University of California, Davis School of Law
Presented by: Center for Professional Ethics

Summary: William A. Brahms Lecture on Law and Religion

• Constitutional law does not take free exercise rights seriously. Creating a more complex free exercise jurisprudence

• How do we balance religious exercise against conflicting state interests?

Professor Brownstein is an expert on church-state issues and has also written extensively on freedom of speech, privacy and autonomy rights and other constitutional law subjects. His articles have been published in numerous academic journals, including the Stanford Law Review. Professor Brownstein teaches Constitutional Law, Law and Religion, and Torts at the UC Davis School of Law, is a frequent lecturer at academic conferences and in law related programs before civic, legal, religious and educational groups. He received his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1977.

Duration : 1:2:14

Read more about Taking Free Exercise Rights Seriously

Business Law and Regulation in the Roberts Court – Labor and Employment

September 17, 2010
“Business Law and Regulation in the Roberts Court”
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Center for Business Law and Regulation Symposium
Cleveland, Ohio

Duration : 1:30:23

Read more about Business Law and Regulation in the Roberts Court – Labor and Employment

Rihanna – Cold Case Love (with lyrics)

On my roof
Dark and Im burning of love
I dont need proof
Im torn apart
And you know

What you did to me
Was a crime
Cold case love
And I let you reach me
One more time
But thats enough
Oh, oh

Your love is breaking the law
But I need a new witness
So wake me up when its over
It dont make any difference
Will it ever be solved
Or am I taking the fall
Truth was there all along
Tell me how did we miss it

We opened up a
Cold case love
And it got the best of us

And now printed pictures
And white lines
Are all thats left
At the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love
Oh, oh, oh

Shouldve investigated
But love blinded eyes
Couldnt see, no
And then I tried to cage it
But your love aint the kind
That you can keep

Release me now cause
I did my time
Of this cold case love
My hearts no longer cold
And confined
Ive had enough
Oh, oh, oh

Your love is breaking the law
But I need a new witness
So wake me up when its over
It dont make any difference
Will it ever be solved
Or am I taking the fall
Truth was there all along
Tell me how did we miss it

We opened up a
Cold case love
And it got the best of us

And now printed pictures
And white lines
Are all thats left
At the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love
Oh, oh, oh

We lost our way
Took this too far
Now Ill never find
The pieces of my heart

Weve lost enough
Looking for a truth
That was here all along

Cold case love
And it got the best of us

And now printed pictures
And white lines
Are all thats left
At the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

We opened up
A cold case love
And it got the best of us

And now printed pictures
And white lines
Are all thats left
At the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love
Oh, oh, oh

Duration : 0:6:6

Read more about Rihanna – Cold Case Love (with lyrics)

Can you apply case law and opinions form one state to another?

Currently doing my own PRO SE research. I’m trying to find info on if I can use case law and opinion in one state (jurisdiction) into another? In example say Illinois to Virginia? I read Indiana Appellate Court decisions as a hobby and cases from other states are cited all of the time, especially when […]

Lawrence Lessig: Corrupt Congress a Farm League for K Street Lobbyists

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2009/10/08/Lawrence_Lessig_on_Institutional_Corruption

Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig makes a sweeping indictment of the relationship between special interest groups, their lobbyists, and Capitol Hill politicians. “Members, staffers and bureaucrats increasingly have a common business model in their head as they serve in Washington,” says Lessig. “The business model is focused on their life after government – life as lobbyists.”

—–

Larry Lessig introduces the Safra lecture series with a discussion on institutional corruption.

He explores the prevalence of this form of corruption in fields ranging from politics to medicine to journalism, and describes his plan to study and contain this problem. – Safra Foundation Center for Ethics at Harvard University

Lawrence Lessig is a professor of law at Stanford Law School and founder of the school’s Center for Internet and Society. He teaches and writes in the areas of constitutional law, contracts, and the law of cyberspace. Prior to joining the Stanford faculty, he was Berkman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a professor at the University of Chicago.

He clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and for Justice Antonin Scalia on the United States Supreme Court. For much of his career, he has focused on law and technology, especially as it affects copyright.

Recognized for arguing against interpretations of copyright that could stifle innovation and discourse online, he is CEO of the Creative Commons project, and he has been a columnist for Wired, Red Herring, and The Industry Standard.

Duration : 0:4:29

Read more about Lawrence Lessig: Corrupt Congress a Farm League for K Street Lobbyists

ABC News Covers Open Carry in Livermore CA. Captures Illegal Detainment and Search

A Livermore man was giving an interview to local ABC news station in the San Francisco Bay Area about Open Carry when multiple officers from Livermore PD came “in response to a 911 call” about a man with a gun (MWAG). They proceeded to over react with a show of force and illegally search the man and detain.

The Penal Code that the officers invoke to do the search is PC12031(e) and it is Constitutionally invalid and illegal. It will be challenged soon. A person can not be stopped and harassed by police while doing LEGAL things. The officers are misusing this penal code to go on a fishing expedition in hopes to incriminate the law abiding. Officers do not have Probable Cause here unless they can articulate facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that crime is afoot.

Duration : 0:2:42

Read more about ABC News Covers Open Carry in Livermore CA. Captures Illegal Detainment and Search