Need a Lawyer for Truck Accident Case | Rasansky Law Firm

http://bit.ly/a8133D
If you need a lawyer for a truck accident case, The Rasansky Law Firm is here to fight for you. If you have been hit by a semi truck or 18 wheeler, you will need a lawyer to help get compensation for your losses, damages, and pain and suffering. Trucking companies have teams of lawyers fighting to keep money in their pockets, hire an experienced semi-truck lawyer to fight to get what you deserve. Call the Rasansky Law Firm for a free case evaluation at 877-331-4156 or visit our website www.TexasInjuryAttorney.com. For more information, please visit www.texastruckwreck.com.

Duration : 0:1:4

Read more about Need a Lawyer for Truck Accident Case | Rasansky Law Firm

Persecution of communists’ in (fake) western democracies: case law summaries

Q:To what extent did public and political opinion in the west undermine the impartiality of judicial decision-making during the cold-war era?
—————————————-

USA

In a famous dissent, Justice Douglas of the US Supreme Court declared:

‘We have deemed it more costly to liberty to suppress despised minorities than to let them vent their spleen’ (Dennis v United States U.S. 494 at p. 585 (1951) (U.S.S.C.).

No western democracy has practiced the tolerance exposed [mistake in video, it should read “expoused”] by Justice Douglas-in the above statement, without at some stage censoring unpopular organizations. Douglas was in a minority of two on a US Supreme Court bench which upheld convictions entered against Communist party sympathizers for conspiring to overthrow the US government. (Joseph, P,think it’s “1998” edn., Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand, ).

In Dennis v United States, above, the US Supreme Court upheld convictions against communist party officials for conspiring to teach or advocate the overthrow of the government by force or violence. Here, the Court considered that the advocacy of the communist doctrine was to be equated with conspiring to forcibly overthrow the US government.

Dennis was decided in 1951, at the height of cold-war tensions between the USSR and the US. Justice Black aligned with Justice Douglas in the minority stating:

‘Public opinion being what it is now, few will protest the conviction of these Communist petitioners. There is hope, however, that in calmer times, when present pressures, passions, and fears subside, this or some other later court will restore the First Amendment liberties to the high place where they belong in a free society.’ (Dennis, supra, at 581).

Justice Black’s statement was realized six years later in Yates v United States 354 U.S. 298 (1957) (U.S.S.C). This time, a differently constituted Supreme Court bench quashed the convictions of 14 Communist Party leaders that had been entered for similar reasons under the same Act.

With the easing of east-west relations, the Court drew a clear distinction between the advocacy of forcible overthrow of government-as an abstract doctrine, and the advocacy of action to achieve that result.

According to legal philosopher Wolfgang Friedman, it was impossible to remove the judgment of the US Supreme Court from the political tensions and public opinions that existed at that time. (W. Friedman, Legal Theory, (4th edn. , 1960, at p.95).

Australia

Australia also expressed abhorrence at communist doctrine during the post-war era. In Burns v Ransley (1949) 79 C.L.R. 101 (H.C.), the Australian High Court upheld a conviction for sedition entered against a communist speaker who, when asked, announced that, in the event of a war, he would fight on the side of the Soviet Union. He was convicted for words he had spoken in reply to a hypothetical question, and not for inciting mutiny or violence.

The following year the Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth) declared the Australian Communist Party to be a revolutionary organization which jeopardized the defence of the Commonwealth. The statute dissolved the Communist Party and all affiliated organizations declared illegal under the Act.

The fundamental democratic principle of freedom of expression was restored when a majority of the High Court of Australia in Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1, declared the Communist Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth) to be unconstitutional and beyond the defence powers of the Commonwealth (see also R v Sharky (1949) 79 CLR 121).

New Zealand

During the early 1980s in New Zealand, Priminister Robert Muldoon took exception to the Socialist Unity Party and questioned it’s right to exist in a free and democratic society. However, a government, expounding the rule of law, must demonstrate greater justification for out-lawing a particular group or organization, for reasons other than personal enmity (Joseph, supra, at p.191).

See also New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s.14 (right to freedom of expression), and related case law; and Human Rights Act 1993, s.21(j)(prohibits discrimination on grounds of political opinion) incorporated, by reference, into s.19 NZBORA; note also- Crimes (Repeal of Seditious Offences) Amendment Act 2007; & see Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981, s.11 (offences involving New Zealand flag)

Duration : 0:4:20

Read more about Persecution of communists’ in (fake) western democracies: case law summaries

Rihanna – Cold Case Love (+LYRICS)

Listen to Rihanna song from her 4th album ‘Rated R’.
On my roof
Dark & Im burning a rose
I dont need proof
Im torn apart & you know
What you did to me was a crime
Cold Case Love
& I let you reach me one more time
But thats enough

Your love was breaking the law
But I needed a witness
So pick me up when its over
It dont make any difference
Will it ever be solved
Or am I taking the fall
Truth was there all along
Tell me how did we miss it

We opened up a cold case love
& It got the best of us
& Now prints, pictures & white outlines
Are all thats left at the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

Shouldve investigated
But love blinded eyes
Couldnt see (no)
& Then I tried to cage it
But your love aint the kind you can keep
Release me now cause I did my time
Of this cold case love
My hearts no longer cold & confined
Ive had enough

Your love was breaking the law
But I needed a witness
So pick me up when its over
It dont make any difference
Will it ever be solved
Or am I taking the fall
Truth was there all along
Tell me how did we miss it

We opened up a cold case love
& It got the best of us
& Now prints, pictures & white outlines
Are all thats left at the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

We lost our way
Took this too far
Now Ill never find the pieces of my heart
Weve lost enough
Looking for a truth
That was here all along

Cold case love
& It got the best of us
& Now prints, pictures & white outlines
Are all thats left at the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

Cold case love
& It got the best of us
& Now prints, pictures & white outlines
Are all thats left at the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

We opened up a cold case love
& It got the best of us
& Now prints, pictures & white outlines
Are all thats left at the scene of a crime
Of a cold case love

Duration : 0:6:5

Read more about Rihanna – Cold Case Love (+LYRICS)

Law and Order Potato Case Squad Pt One

In this hilarious parody of Law and Order. A potato is found dead, and it’s up to the potato case squad to get him justice. Guest starrring Mariah from Mariahcam (http://www.youtube.com/user/mariahcam), Kator from melonkatorandme (http://www.youtube.com/user/melonkatorandme), and a bunch of other people who dont have youtube accounts. (Law and Order and the law and order theme song are the property of NBC) (The sound effects in this are from partners in rhyme)

Duration : 0:6:30

Read more about Law and Order Potato Case Squad Pt One

Accutane Lawsuit Lawyer | FREE Case Review-All 50 States!

http://www.Accutane-Lawsuit-Lawyer.com can provide American victims of Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche with a defective drug lawyer in all 50 states.

Defective Drug Attorneys Can Aid In An Accutane Lawsuit

Juries have held that Roche did not properly warn consumers of Accutane’s potentially dangerous side effects, and as a result, many innocent people are suffering from the defective drug. If you or a family member are one of them, alert a defective drug lawyer with Accutane-Lawsuit-Lawyer.com and get the financial compensation you deserve for your medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Simply submit the free case evaluation form at Accutane-Lawsuit-Lawyer.com, or call toll-free to 1 (800) 339-0606, and a legal representative will respond shortly to help you assess your Accutane side effects case. You may be entitled to substantial economic recovery for your losses caused by the negligence of a pharmaceutical corporation which placed its own greed and profits above public safety and the greater good.

Duration : 0:2:4

Read more about Accutane Lawsuit Lawyer | FREE Case Review-All 50 States!

California Supreme Court -California Case Law

The Second Appellate Court Justices–Steven Z. Perren Kenneth R. Yegan and Arthur Gilbert in their published July 28, 2010 Case Law decision put responsibility for this culvert as stated: “The court found that the Railroad may have been negligent by failing to enlarge the culvert or requiring that its tenant do so.”

OK–Why is this OCSD pipe allowed in this drainage channel? Why is OCSD not Responsible?

Superior Court Judge Teresa Estrada-Mullaney in her February 2, 2009 Judgment Decision “Notice of Judgment” States: “Judge Tangeman determined the flooding problem was “static” for several years prior to Plaintiff’s purchase of his property. Plaintiff contends the flooding is continuous and can be abated. Plaintiff argues Defendants negligent maintenance of the drainage system increases the frequency and severity of the flooding. That is inconsistent with Judge Tangeman’s determination that the primary culprit was POVE’s improvements, rather than negligent maintenance of the drainage system. There was no showing that Union’s operation of Well No. 8 contributed to the blockage. There was no showing of the County’s responsibility for maintaining the drainage channel. There was no evidence that any accumulated debris in State’s right of way contributed to the problems in the operation of the drainage system. County, State, Union or OCSD could not have abated the nuisance by undertaking any maintenance”

Why would the State of California use the State Highway for storm water retention?

Molly Thurmond, ESQ. (SBN 104973) and Thomas A Cregger, ESQ. (SBN 124402) both knew at the time of trial that both had knowledge of these Causation/Date of Stabilization-Photos and Documents,Whitnesses that they withheld from discovery and Judge Martin J. Tangeman! (DURING TRIAL.) Hall, Hieatt & Connely, LLP on July 30, 2008 provided Questionnaires. The color photos above where not provided until December 2, 2008 after trial as previously requested. Dean Benedix, County response No. 2–October 16, 2008 “Response: We will produce copies of the requested attachments and photographs per your request once you have paid the estimated coping costs of $15.00.”
Lou Wheeler photos-Documents showing no flooding prior to 2004 –as viewed by Dean Benedix, Randy Ghezzi, Raleigh Greene, Max Keller, Cliff Howe, Michael Eckman per Dean Benedix statement: “I believe the attached photos are from Lois Wheeler of Oceano 481-5687 D Benedix 6/10/02”
Response No.3 from Dean Benedix After trial regarding documents wittheld from discovery by the County of San Luis Obispo! “We will produce copies of written communications and photos (in Color) Sent by oceano community members to Questa Engineering or the County of San Luis Obispo in regards to flooding in Oceano between 2000-2004 per your request once you have paid the estimated coping costs of $10.00.”

San Luis Obispo County/Union Pacific Railroad Exhibit # 579 photo documents withheld from discovery by County of San Luis Obispo and Union Pacific Rail Road shows Caltrans raising State Highway 1 a foot and the flooding problem on east side of State Highway 1 this created, as stated in the document provided with County 2002 Drainage Study Questionnaire! These color photos where provided December 2, 2008 and are not part of (Appendix 15) showing no Stabilization to this drainage system!

Frustuck v. City of Fairfax (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 345 [28 Cal.Rptr. 357] involved damage caused by an accelerated flow of surface water over newly developed land adjoining plaintiff’s property, collected in an enlarged culvert and sent through plaintiff’s existing ditch. The court noted the basis of the city’s liability was its failure to appreciate the probability that the drainage system from the new development to the Frustuck property, functioning as deliberately conceived, and as altered and maintained by the diversion of waters from their normal channels, would result in some damage to private property. (Id. at p. 362.) The drainage system, which the city had accepted and approved, was a public improvement and it did not matter if the city had not been the one that actually physically diverted the water. (Ibid.) “The fact that the work is performed by a contractor, subdivider or a private owner of property does not necessarily exonerate a public agency, if such contractor, subdivider or owner follows the plans and specifications furnished or approved by the public agency.” (Id. at pp. 362-363.)

The Second Appellate talks about this in Barrett v. County of Ventura–Filed 6/23/

Duration : 0:10:49

Read more about California Supreme Court -California Case Law

4409 — Pearce grants Amnesty to Law Enforcement

http://www.Formula4409.com

This video is NOT anti-cop, its pro-peace officer.

●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●

Russell Pearce claims law enforcement acts on our behalf and this is why they deserve infinite amnesty from prosecution and civil suits.

Why stop there Russell, lets just make EVERY government employee that works on our behalf immune from prosecution and indemnified.

Why should cops, prosecutors, and judges be the only ones above the law? I would love to see the clerk at the DMV running amock with immunity. How about the metro bus driver?

●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●

FIFTH AMENDMENT — ‘No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or — PROPERTY –, without due process of law.

Russell claims that any case you bring against a cop is frivolous and his legislation is the judge and jury on this issue.

●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●

I will admit, I don’t quite trust law enforcement with this power because I am personally familiar with malicious arrests and prosecutions and I will guarantee this power will be abused.

There are so many issues with this bill the I could rant for 2 hours.

Duration : 0:14:31

Read more about 4409 — Pearce grants Amnesty to Law Enforcement