If Obama was a REAL constitutional law professor, would he have such low regard for the US Constitution?

I just find it hard to believe that a former "law school" professor would have such low regard for the US Constitution. It just seems strange to me…
Google it yourself; I don’t do others homework.

i have always said,he is either the worst constitutional scholar,or he is deliberately committing treason. i think the latter applies
as far as his violations,how about bailout of GM and taking control,giving money to banks is another has anyone ever read the constitution,does the 10th amendment ring a bell

Post Author: mark

15 thoughts on “If Obama was a REAL constitutional law professor, would he have such low regard for the US Constitution?

    Pat

    (February 12, 2010 - 8:07 am)

    Give one example of how Obama has violated the US Constitution.
    Go ahead.
    I dare you,.
    References :

    goodluckwithhat

    (February 12, 2010 - 8:22 am)

    Precisely my point in the last answer I gave.
    References :

    Paul B

    (February 12, 2010 - 9:12 am)

    no. i can’t take anything any politician says seriously.
    References :

    Love My Freedom

    (February 12, 2010 - 9:35 am)

    Well he’s not a REAL US born citizen and he made it to the White House.
    References :

    Blue

    (February 12, 2010 - 10:23 am)

    I love the supporting examples to your statement.

    They teach you in high school back up statement with evidence and expand upon that in college and grad school.

    Edit: Way to take personal responsbility! I’d love to see it from your point of view so I could find your opinion valid.
    References :

    phil

    (February 12, 2010 - 10:45 am)

    i have always said,he is either the worst constitutional scholar,or he is deliberately committing treason. i think the latter applies
    as far as his violations,how about bailout of GM and taking control,giving money to banks is another has anyone ever read the constitution,does the 10th amendment ring a bell
    References :

    rantman

    (February 12, 2010 - 11:05 am)

    yes because uneducated people such as yourself know so much more about the constitution than a Harvard trained lawyer who taught constitutional law at one of the nations best universities (university of chicago)*rolls eyes*
    References :
    name one constitutional law book that you’ve read or even one book about the constitution. in fact, i doubt you’ve read the ENTIRE constitution, but i’m sure you’re delusional enough to think you’re an expert on it.

    Mr.JoChan (Jordan Chandler)

    (February 12, 2010 - 11:11 am)

    A classic quote by Winston Churchill
    "If one is a moral person and is not a crook before,they will inevitably be after and during office"
    This can be said about many former presidents as well.
    References :
    Independent American

    If you seek Amy

    (February 12, 2010 - 11:33 am)

    /great question and why have we never seen his transcripts, and why did he only publish one article as the president of harvard law review – when the norm was to publish much more?
    References :

    lawgirl

    (February 12, 2010 - 12:07 pm)

    He doesn’t. The only people that claim that are those who never took a con law course.
    References :

    Harry Reid, Brainless Scarecrow

    (February 12, 2010 - 12:30 pm)

    His pick for a SCOTUS replacement doesn’t understand Constitutional Law either. Nor does she understand what the role of a Judge is. I would further postulate she has no understanding of the "Three branches of government" either.

    Just because you can pass a few tests in school doesn’t make you a "scholar". Especially when you can’t even understand the "natural born citizen" clause in the Constitution. The fact that "Separation of church and state" appears nowhere in the Constitution etc.

    Sorry, a scholar he ain’t. A destroyer of a country he is.
    References :
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090705120714AA7pGSA&r=w

    tonalc2

    (February 12, 2010 - 12:55 pm)

    Please provide an example of how he has illustrated low regard for the Constitution. We’ll wait…
    References :

    brown9500v4

    (February 12, 2010 - 1:38 pm)

    If you were a REAL rhinestone cowboy…Wouldn’t you be wearing a rhinestone cowboy hat instead of a sailor costume.
    References :

    aurorah

    (February 12, 2010 - 2:10 pm)

    How about a fact or three to back up your claim that he has a low regard for the Constitution?
    You asked the question, you do the homework. Otherwise it’s just hot air.
    References :

    Aleferny

    (February 12, 2010 - 2:24 pm)

    Cowboy we shouldn’t have to google it….. you asked the question dude???? cmon now… back it up with a little something called "proof"!!!!
    References :

Leave a Reply