Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania on case law and the Constitution 2 of 5

Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania on case law and the Constitution Pt 2 of 5

Duration : 0:8:35

Read more about Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania on case law and the Constitution 2 of 5

Brad Bannon on Supreme Court back in session

Scott interviews Washington DC political strategist Brad Bannon

(Huffington Post)

First Amendment cases top the Supreme Court’s docket as it begins a new term with a new justice and three women on the bench for the first time.

The court will look at provocative anti-gay protests at military funerals and a California law banning the sale of violent video games to children. These cases worry free speech advocates, who fear the court could limit First Amendment freedoms.

The funeral protest lawsuit, over signs praising American war deaths, “is one of those cases that tests our commitment to the First Amendment,” said Steven Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Another case involves a different aspect of the First Amendment, the government’s relationship to religion. The justices will decide whether Arizona’s income tax credit scholarship program, in essence, directs state money to religious schools in violation of the constitutional separation of church and state.
More at http://lbnnews.com

Duration : 0:10:32

Read more about Brad Bannon on Supreme Court back in session

loan modification Attorney, San Diego offers Legal Advice on Loan Modification Questions

Loan Modification Attorney , Michelle Morelli with FMG in San Diego answers consumers Top Loan Modification questions as Seen on The Trust Factor and Legal Advice Lawyers. These Loan Modification questions include; “What is a Loan Modification?” “Why can’t I just Modify my loan without using an attorney?” “If I am upside down in my home, what can you do to help me as a Loan Modification Attorney?” “What if I don’t qualify for a Loan Modification, are there other options?” “Do I have to be delinquent on my payments to get a Loan Modification?”

Duration : 0:9:52

Read more about loan modification Attorney, San Diego offers Legal Advice on Loan Modification Questions

FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY: The Inside Story of the Mafia Cops Case (Part 2)

Part 2 of 2.

In this interview, I sit down with Michael Vecchione, the Chief of the Rackets Division in the Kings County District Attorney’s Office, to discuss his new book “FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY: The Inside Story of the Mafia Cops Case.”

Friends of the Family is out on May 12, 2009.

Book Description
Detectives Louie Eppolito and Steve Caracappa were the most corrupt and dangerous cops in American history. When they retired in the early 1990s, they left behind a pile of bodies—and for more than a decade, it looked like they were going to get away with it.

As highly decorated NYPD detectives with access to the department’s most sensitive information, they sold their badges to the Mafia—and became murderers for the mob. Eventually they retired to Las Vegas, believing they had put their lives of murder and mayhem safely behind them. And they would have lived happily ever after, if not for one dedicated cop at the end of his career and an assistant district attorney. Detective Tommy Dades and Brooklyn Assistant DA Mike Vecchione turned this seemingly unsolvable cold-blooded case into one of the great law-and-order stories in the annals of New York City. And for the first time, in this book, Dades and Vecchione tell the whole inside story of the investigation.

For Detective Tommy Dades, the case began with a phone call from a distraught mother who just happened to mention an almost forgotten meeting that had taken place years earlier. Dades and Mike Vecchione had performed cold-case miracles before, but this one seemed impossible. Together, quietly and tenaciously, they began to uncover the hideous truth. A highly secret joint state and federal task force began building a body-by-body case against an incredible array of characters, from one of the most viciously insane Mafia bosses in history—who wanted to kill people he dreamed were plotting against him—to the one-eyed Jew who knew all the secrets. As the cold case got front-page-headline hot, Dades and Vecchione encountered an unexpected obstacle: the federal prosecutor plotted to take the case—and those headlines—away from Brooklyn.

For the first time, the two men who brought this incredible story to life reveal the epic confrontations that occurred behind the scenes and led to a stunning courtroom announcement—and came perilously close to destroying the case against the Mafia cops.

Friends of the Family is the complete, inside story of the historic case that rocked the world of law enforcement.

Duration : 0:5:55

Read more about FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY: The Inside Story of the Mafia Cops Case (Part 2)

ATLANTA BANKRUPTCY LAW FIRM: How a Bankruptcy Case Ends.

http://www.hurbanlaw.com A couple of months after your meeting of creditors, you will receive a Notice of Discharge from the court. In a no asset case, this typically happens 75-90 days afterwards. This notice doesn’t list which of your particular debts are discharged, but it provides some general information about the types of debts that are and are not affected by the discharge order.

Tim Hurban Esq.
Hurban Law LLC
201 17th Street
Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30363

P: (404) 654 – 0054
F: (678) 894 – 8464

How to file bankruptcy, georgia bankruptcy lawyer, georgia bankruptcy attorney.

Duration : 0:4:2

Read more about ATLANTA BANKRUPTCY LAW FIRM: How a Bankruptcy Case Ends.

Escondido Personal Injury Law Firm: Attorney Explains Settlement Case Value

Escondido Personal Injury and Accident Attorney Mark C. Blane explains what insurance companies generally look at to evaluate case value on a personal injury claim, and what type of cases his sees on a typical day at his injury law practice. Mr. Blane also sees Escondido rear-end collision cases, side-swipe cases, multiple vehicle cases, slip and falls, product defects, wrongful death cases, boating accidents, maritime injuries, nursing home abuse, and catastrophic losses. Mr. Blane has been practicing in Escondido personal injury/trauma/catastrophic loss cases since 1999, and can be reached at mark@blanelaw.com, or 24/7 at (888) 845-6269. We encourage you to visit our website at: www.blanelaw.com to find more legal videos on a particular injury and the law that can help you with your legal case.

Duration : 0:2:34

Read more about Escondido Personal Injury Law Firm: Attorney Explains Settlement Case Value

PrePaid Legal Services

http://wserver0.prepaidlegal.com/Multisite/Multisite?site=info&assoc=domeinhorn

We give members access to professional legal counsel not only for traditional legal problems, but for everyday events such as:

* buying a house or a car
* creating a will
* handling a problem with an insurance company
* dealing with identity theft…

…and much more where legal review should be routine, but rarely is. These events can be among the most important events in a person’s life, yet there is a tendency for them to take place without proper legal review. For Pre-Paid Legal members, access to legal counsel is only a toll-free phone call away.

Sign-up for membership:
http://wserver0.prepaidlegal.com/Multisite/Multisite?site=info&assoc=domeinhorn

Duration : 0:3:51

Read more about PrePaid Legal Services

Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania on case law and the Constitution 1of 5

Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 only politician does not understand that the constitution is supreme law of the land

Duration : 0:8:27

Read more about Attorney General Tom Corbet 4/17/10 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania on case law and the Constitution 1of 5

Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter Intimidation – Bill O’Reilly Reports

Attorney General Eric Holder, I believe for political reasons, has dropped all charges relating to the Black Panthers voter intimidation in last falls Presidential election. Why would he drop such an open and shut case? The Black panthers never even showed up to defend themselves. There was no way that the government was going to lose this case, unless of course they were to drop all charges, which is what they did, but why?

I believe that Obama and Eric Holder didn’t want to alienate their core voters by going after the “New” Black Panthers. And sense they knew that the mainstream news media is in their back pocket, and therefore would not report on it, they just dropped the charges, why would they not? You might think that they would care about equal protection under the law, and just the rule of law in general, but it is apparent that they do not. It is obvious to me that they couldn’t give a flying flip about the rule of law; they do as they please.

If you think about it, the underlying reason that this was not prosecuted is because it was a case where white people were intimidated to vote a certain way, or to not vote at all. I’m not sure if you have noticed it or not, but the “progressives” are not concerned in the least about protecting the rights of anyone who is white; they could care less. They do not apply the law equally, but instead they use it to their advantage in order to further their political goals, one of which is to dismantle the power structure in this country as it now exists.

It looks like Eric Holder is as much of a fraud as Barack Obama is; they are like two peas in a pod, they compliment each other perfectly. They should have great success over the next four years unraveling our Republics core legal principles; of this I have no doubt.
jbranstetter04

Dept. Of Justice Drops New Black Panthers Case

Sources told The Bulletin that there is internal dissension in the Department of Justice (DOJ) about a voter intimidation case from last years presidential election. Obama appointees did not want to proceed with the case, while the career prosecutors did. The incident occurred in Philadelphia and involved the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense (NBPPSD).

The DOJ filed a lawsuit under the Voting Rights Act against the NBPPSD and three of its members alleging the defendants intimidated Philadelphia voters during the Nov. 4, 2008 general election. The action was filed in January before President George W. Bush left office.

The complaint, filed in the United States District Court in Philadelphia, alleged that on Election Day, Nov. 4, 2008 in Philadelphia, NBPPSD members Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were stationed at the entrance to a polling location at 1221 Fairmount Avenue, wearing the uniform of the organization. It also states Mr. Shabazz repeatedly brandished a police-style baton weapon.

The complaint said NBPPSD Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz confirmed that the placement of Messrs. Shabazz and Jackson was part of a nationwide effort to deploy NBPPSD members at polling locations on Election Day. The Justice Department sought an injunction to prevent any similar future actions by NBPPSD members at polling locations.
Intimidation outside of a polling place is contrary to the democratic process, said Acting Assistant Attorney General Grace Chung Becker at the time. The Department takes allegations of voter intimidation seriously.

None of the defendants responded to the lawsuit. Instead of immediately filing for a default judgment as is the normal procedure, sources told The Bulletin the DOJ asked for and received an order from the court providing an extension of time to file. Specifically, they asked the court to give them until May 15.

But on May 15, DOJ changed its mind again. Rather than a default judgment, the DOJ filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit for two of the defendants. This included Mr. Jackson, who identified himself to police as a member of the Democratic Committee in the 14th Ward. He also produced credentials to that effect.

It is absolutely unprecedented for the Justice Department to dismiss a lawsuit after the defendants failed to answer the suit and are thus in default,” he said.

Mr. von Spakovsky said that the NBPPSD’s lack of response was the legal equivalent of an admission of all theallegations made about the defendants organized effort to threaten and intimidate voters.

“And dismissing an individual who was a local Democratic party official who defaulted by not answering the complaint smacks of the worst sort of political partisanship,” he said. “It is completely contrary to all of the promises that Eric Holder made when he was confirmed to be Attorney General…..

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/05/29/top_stories/doc4a1f42b32c161287079901.txt

Duration : 0:6:41

Read more about Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter Intimidation – Bill O’Reilly Reports