MOORS OBLIGATION TO ENFORCE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!

National grand governor of the Moorish Science Temple of America demonstrating nationality & birthrights & Moorish constitutional obligations as Indigenous Sovereign Moorish American Nationals

Duration : 0:9:56

Read more about MOORS OBLIGATION TO ENFORCE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!

Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…3/4

To answer the question of ‘what acts and statutes’ are not regarded as law, the answer is none of them. To what Laws do you have to give authority to? Your own. Figure out what they are, then live by them (and serve notice, if you care to change anything for the others that are still slaves to the system…and the future)

Duration : 0:7:37

Read more about Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…3/4

Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…2/4

To answer the question of ‘what acts and statutes’ are not regarded as law, the answer is none of them. To what Laws do you have to give authority to? Your own. Figure out what they are, then live by them (and serve notice, if you care to change anything for the others that are still slaves to the system…and the future)

Duration : 0:6:26

Read more about Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…2/4

Josh Freese: Indie 1031 Interview w/ Joe Escalante -How To Sell Too Many Records -Part 1

Josh came by my legal advice show to talk about the constant threat of selling “too many records” that dogs his new release “Since 1972” on Outerscope Records. Usually on this show I’m taking calls and answering show biz legal questions but we took a break from that to get an update on what’s happening with Josh’s cool and effective price tiering that has made his new CD something everyone is talking about where ever I go.

Barely Legal Radio can be heard live every Friday from 11am to noon on indie1031.com in Los Angeles hosted by Joe Escalante. Call on Fridays to get your legal questions answered for free or better yet, email your questions to info@barelylegalradio.com and we will set up a time to call you back and record your question and answer for the next broadcast. Go to barelylegalradio.com for more details. It’s free and worth every penny.

Duration : 0:9:45

Read more about Josh Freese: Indie 1031 Interview w/ Joe Escalante -How To Sell Too Many Records -Part 1

Limewire shutdown FOREVER!? *BREAKING NEWS*

Full article here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/oct/27/limewire-filesharers-injunction

The InJunction:
http://download.limewire.com/injunction/Injunction.pdf

Limewire, the most popular P2P file-sharing software application, has been shutdown today by the federal new york city police court. It has been issued a permanant injunction and will be charged in January. Could this be the end of limewire???

ON limewire.com it says:

“Legal Notice

This is an official notice that LimeWire is under a court-ordered injunction to stop distributing and supporting its file-sharing software. Downloading or sharing copyrighted content without authorization is illegal.”

Music: “Basic Break.wav” by VEXST of http://freesound.org

tags: limewire p2p file sharing free mp3 downloads music movies games dvds shutdown forever illegal legal court injunction hacking .m4a itunes high quality 320kbps aressted limewire not working guntella limewire p2p file sharing free mp3 downloads music movies games dvds shutdown forever illegal legal court injunction hacking .m4a itunes high quality 320kbps aressted not working guntella torrent software alternative breakbeat HD blu-ray ps3 xbox 360 iso ipod iphone free applications gift card microsoft points psn gamertag mod hack software news breaking pro for free no more broken fix cant download
Limewire has been shut down – BREAKING NEWS
Limewire has been shut down – BREAKING NEWS
Limewire has been shut down – BREAKING NEWS
Limewire has been shut down – BREAKING NEWS

Duration : 0:0:36

Read more about Limewire shutdown FOREVER!? *BREAKING NEWS*

How i won my court case with no legal aid

a few tips just incase u find urself not being able to get legal aid and having to represent yourself at court.

Duration : 0:8:48

Read more about How i won my court case with no legal aid

NH: Gun Trial of Free Stater could challenge carry laws

Sponsor: http://PledgeBank.com/Next1000 – Arrested for open carrying inside a vehicle without government permission…Bill Walker of Grafton, NH hopes to turn trouble into triumph. This case conceivably could go before the state Supreme Court, pitting New Hampshire’s Constitution against its concealed carry law. Walker’s trial is October 28, details at link below.

To donate for their legal defense:
http://williamwalker.chipin.com/william-walker-conceal-carry-case

To get the latest details on case or inform us of your availability to videotape trial:
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=15667.0

Music by:
http://ccmixter.org/files/minimal_art/8652

If you want to commission an ad like the one in this video, the cost as of 10/08 is three cents per video view. But views after the first week are free. And your link in the video descrip is free. Message me through this site or e-mail me: RidleyReport at… live period com

Additional Keywords: second amendment sister 2nd open carry concealed firearms pistols revolvers ak-47 glock 19 sks gun control owners guns license weapons nra go-nh gonh
national rifle association pink pistols ryan marvin pro-gun dave ridley report ridleyreport free state project ron paul new hampshire william walker bill ivy ankrom sharon walker civil disobedience body armor law government police manchester grafton gun confiscation katrina new orleans fema …. Please thank our sponsor by visiting … PLEDGEBANK.COM/NEXT1000

Duration : 0:5:24

Read more about NH: Gun Trial of Free Stater could challenge carry laws

Adventures in Legal Land (with Marc Stevens)

2004 interview with Marc Stevens, anarcho-capitalist/voluntaryist/libertarian, author of “Adventures in Legal Land”, and host of “The No State Project” (a weekly radio show discussing news and issues related to the law, courts, and personal liberty, with a particular interest in considering free-market alternatives to government-provided services).

Website:
http://www.marcstevens.net/

The book:
http://www.amazon.com/Marc-Stevens-Adventures-Legal-Land/dp/061512299X

On Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MarcStevens3

Duration : 0:39:53

Read more about Adventures in Legal Land (with Marc Stevens)

Persecution of communists’ in (fake) western democracies: case law summaries

Q:To what extent did public and political opinion in the west undermine the impartiality of judicial decision-making during the cold-war era?
—————————————-

USA

In a famous dissent, Justice Douglas of the US Supreme Court declared:

‘We have deemed it more costly to liberty to suppress despised minorities than to let them vent their spleen’ (Dennis v United States U.S. 494 at p. 585 (1951) (U.S.S.C.).

No western democracy has practiced the tolerance exposed [mistake in video, it should read “expoused”] by Justice Douglas-in the above statement, without at some stage censoring unpopular organizations. Douglas was in a minority of two on a US Supreme Court bench which upheld convictions entered against Communist party sympathizers for conspiring to overthrow the US government. (Joseph, P,think it’s “1998” edn., Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand, ).

In Dennis v United States, above, the US Supreme Court upheld convictions against communist party officials for conspiring to teach or advocate the overthrow of the government by force or violence. Here, the Court considered that the advocacy of the communist doctrine was to be equated with conspiring to forcibly overthrow the US government.

Dennis was decided in 1951, at the height of cold-war tensions between the USSR and the US. Justice Black aligned with Justice Douglas in the minority stating:

‘Public opinion being what it is now, few will protest the conviction of these Communist petitioners. There is hope, however, that in calmer times, when present pressures, passions, and fears subside, this or some other later court will restore the First Amendment liberties to the high place where they belong in a free society.’ (Dennis, supra, at 581).

Justice Black’s statement was realized six years later in Yates v United States 354 U.S. 298 (1957) (U.S.S.C). This time, a differently constituted Supreme Court bench quashed the convictions of 14 Communist Party leaders that had been entered for similar reasons under the same Act.

With the easing of east-west relations, the Court drew a clear distinction between the advocacy of forcible overthrow of government-as an abstract doctrine, and the advocacy of action to achieve that result.

According to legal philosopher Wolfgang Friedman, it was impossible to remove the judgment of the US Supreme Court from the political tensions and public opinions that existed at that time. (W. Friedman, Legal Theory, (4th edn. , 1960, at p.95).

Australia

Australia also expressed abhorrence at communist doctrine during the post-war era. In Burns v Ransley (1949) 79 C.L.R. 101 (H.C.), the Australian High Court upheld a conviction for sedition entered against a communist speaker who, when asked, announced that, in the event of a war, he would fight on the side of the Soviet Union. He was convicted for words he had spoken in reply to a hypothetical question, and not for inciting mutiny or violence.

The following year the Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth) declared the Australian Communist Party to be a revolutionary organization which jeopardized the defence of the Commonwealth. The statute dissolved the Communist Party and all affiliated organizations declared illegal under the Act.

The fundamental democratic principle of freedom of expression was restored when a majority of the High Court of Australia in Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1, declared the Communist Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth) to be unconstitutional and beyond the defence powers of the Commonwealth (see also R v Sharky (1949) 79 CLR 121).

New Zealand

During the early 1980s in New Zealand, Priminister Robert Muldoon took exception to the Socialist Unity Party and questioned it’s right to exist in a free and democratic society. However, a government, expounding the rule of law, must demonstrate greater justification for out-lawing a particular group or organization, for reasons other than personal enmity (Joseph, supra, at p.191).

See also New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s.14 (right to freedom of expression), and related case law; and Human Rights Act 1993, s.21(j)(prohibits discrimination on grounds of political opinion) incorporated, by reference, into s.19 NZBORA; note also- Crimes (Repeal of Seditious Offences) Amendment Act 2007; & see Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981, s.11 (offences involving New Zealand flag)

Duration : 0:4:20

Read more about Persecution of communists’ in (fake) western democracies: case law summaries

The Return to De Jure Constitutional Law is RIGHT NOW underway. Stay Vigillant

http://www.halfpasthuman.com/

“Lipper’s” Channel – http://www.youtube.com/user/TheLipperTube

RAP –
http://www.restoreamericaplan.net/
http://guardiansofthefreerepublics.com/front-page.html
http://restoreamericaplan.blogspot.com/

Duration : 0:10:2

Read more about The Return to De Jure Constitutional Law is RIGHT NOW underway. Stay Vigillant