Law, transport, openly carrying, case law, practical considerations, etc.
Duration : 0:6:41
Supreme Court: Death Penalty Is ‘Totally Badass’
Despite arguments against capital punishment, the Justices overwhelmingly approved its use, especially if they get to participate in some executions.
Duration : 0:3:2
Read more about Supreme Court: Death Penalty Is ‘Totally Badass’ …
Classic Case Law 2
In the full programme, construction law expert Roger Knowles talks us through four classic law cases, all of which have had major implications for the construction industry. These include:
Moresk Cleaners v Thomas Henwood Hicks;
British Steel v Cleveland Bridge;
Aluminium Industrie Vaassen v Romalpa Aluminium; and
Butler Machine Tool Company v Ex-Cell-O Corporation.
Duration : 0:2:14
Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…3/4
To answer the question of ‘what acts and statutes’ are not regarded as law, the answer is none of them. To what Laws do you have to give authority to? Your own. Figure out what they are, then live by them (and serve notice, if you care to change anything for the others that are still slaves to the system…and the future)
Duration : 0:7:37
Read more about Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice…3/4 …
Cardozo Law Revue 2007 Beavis and Butt-for
A freshly animated short with a slightly altered version of the Palsgraf v. LIRR case for the 2007 Cardozo Law Revue.
Duration : 0:2:39
Read more about Cardozo Law Revue 2007 Beavis and Butt-for …
Is Yahoo ready to talk about the Electrified legal assembly Cages in Denver now that the news is a week old???
Last week when BBC stumbled upon the cages by accident. My questions about it got violated. YA has never been kind to contemporaneous events. But now all the Big Media has mentioned some version of the story. So, you got a link or what? I have no clue what you’re talking about.
Lawrence Lessig: Congress to Blame for Bush Era Mistakes
Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2009/10/08/Lawrence_Lessig_on_Institutional_Corruption
Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessig explores the concept of institutional responsibility by comparing a boarding school sexual abuse case with Congress during the Administration of President George W. Bush. In both cases, he argues that witnesses who did not act responsibly should be held just as culpable as the offender.
—–
Larry Lessig introduces the Safra lecture series with a discussion on institutional corruption.
He explores the prevalence of this form of corruption in fields ranging from politics to medicine to journalism, and describes his plan to study and contain this problem. – Safra Foundation Center for Ethics at Harvard University
Lawrence Lessig is a professor of law at Stanford Law School and founder of the school’s Center for Internet and Society. He teaches and writes in the areas of constitutional law, contracts, and the law of cyberspace. Prior to joining the Stanford faculty, he was Berkman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a professor at the University of Chicago.
He clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and for Justice Antonin Scalia on the United States Supreme Court. For much of his career, he has focused on law and technology, especially as it affects copyright.
Recognized for arguing against interpretations of copyright that could stifle innovation and discourse online, he is CEO of the Creative Commons project, and he has been a columnist for Wired, Red Herring, and The Industry Standard.
Duration : 0:3:11
Read more about Lawrence Lessig: Congress to Blame for Bush Era Mistakes …
Why aren’t the Democrats emphasizing Obama’s experience teaching Constitutional Law for over 12 years?
Since he taught Constitutional Law for 12 years at the University of Chicago, it puzzles me why his supporters are not pointing to that as a big plus. I would think that a President having extensive knowledge of not only the law, but of the Constitution would make him more qualified to do his job. […]
“This executive order is just a piece of paper”
Key Quotes
•If the bill is signed into law, these statutory requirements and defects are not subject to correction or nullification by the chief executive or his appointees, whether by Executive Order, regulation, or otherwise. (National Right to Life Committee statement)
•An Executive Order cannot prevent insurance companies that pay for abortions from participating in the exchanges. Further, Executive Orders can be undone or modified as quickly as they are created. This is a blatant attempt to subvert democracy and should be quickly quashed. (Dr. Charmaine Yoest, President & CEO of Americans United for Life Action)
•If the Obama Administration continued to falsely believe the Senate bill had no problem on the issue of funding abortion and funding health plans that include abortion, he certainly would not put forth the idea of an EO. Because of an EO would give no protections to the unborn when it comes to funding for abortion in the Senate and Reconciliation bills, FRCAction will still score votes on both in our scorecard for the Second Session of the 111th Congress. (FRC letter to members of Congress)
Better Solutions:
•The Republican plan, available at HealthCare.GOP.gov, would codify the Hyde Amendment and prohibit all authorized and appropriated federal funds from being used to pay for abortion. And under the Republican plan, any health plan that includes abortion coverage may not receive federal funds.
Duration : 0:2:15
Read more about “This executive order is just a piece of paper” …
Estate Planning Advice From Walters and Ward, A.p.c
The process of allocating everything a person owns, or his/her estate, is known as Estate Planning, which happens to be the focus of expertise and Walters and Ward. This planning will ease the process of dividing your estate amongst your heirs or loved ones once death occurs. It will save them time, money, and effort, […]
Recent Comments